Kedu ka iwepu ego mgbaso mmanụ si metụta ụmụ Naịjirịa nkịtị?
Ekwuwo m na e wepụrụ nkwado ego (subsidy) site na slogan, ọ bụghị atụmatụ. Ọ nweghị atụmatụ a pụrụ ịtụkwasị obi maka nnụcha mmanụ n'ime obodo, njem oke mmadụ, nchekwa ụgwọ ọrụ, ma ọ bụ maka ọtụtụ ụlọ ọrụ nta na-adabere n'ike ọkụ dị mfe ịzụta. Agbara m aka na usoro a ga-ebibi ike ịzụ ahịa, mee ka ọnụ ahịa njem rie elu, meekwa ka mmụba ọnụahịa nri jọọ njọ karị, si otú ahụ na-amanye ọtụtụ ndị Naịjirịa ịba n'ụkpa.
A sụgharịrị azịza ndị dị na peeji a site na Bekee site na igwe, ọ bụkwa na onye nsụgharị elelebeghị ha.
Ebe nke a si abịa
Article on X Article by @atiku on X · https://x.com/atiku/status/2102445684846694501 2026-09-22 ›
He described the survey as particularly revealing because 32.4 per cent of rural respondents identified petrol as their primary concern, compared with 11.7 per cent in urban areas. Petrol also emerged as the leading concern in the Southwest, at 30.5 per cent, and the South-South, at 29.1 per cent—clear evidence that the suffering caused by Tinubu’s fuel policy cuts across geography, ethnicity and political affiliation. According to Atiku, “President Tinubu removed subsidy with a slogan, not a strategy. He had no credible plan for domestic refining, mass transportation, wage protection or the millions of small businesses that depend on affordable energy. “He was warned that this reckless approach would destroy purchasing power, increase transportation costs, worsen food inflation and push more Nigerians into poverty. He ignored those warnings.