Bawo ni yiyọ ìrànwọ́ epo kuro ṣe kan àwọn ará Nàìjíríà lásán?
Mo ti sọ pé a mú ìrànwọ́ owó kúrò pẹ̀lú ọ̀rọ̀ aṣolùfọwọ́sowọ́pọ̀, kì í ṣe ìlànà. Kò sí ètò tí ó ṣeé gbára lé fún ìwẹ́ epo nílé, ọkọ̀ ìrìnàjò ọ̀pọ̀ ènìyàn, ìdáàbòbò owó oṣù, tàbí fún àràádọ́ta ọ̀kẹ́ àwọn oníṣòwò kékeré tí wọ́n gbára lé agbára ìná tí ó rọrùn láti rà. Mo kìlọ̀ pé ọ̀nà yìí yóò ba agbára rírà jẹ́, yóò sì mú kí owó ọkọ̀ ìrìnàjò pọ̀ sí i, yóò sì mú kí ìgbòkègbodò owó oúnjẹ burú sí i, tí yóò sì ti ọ̀pọ̀ àwọn ará Nàìjíríà síi sínú òṣì.
Àwọn ìdáhùn tó wà lórí ojú-ìwé yìí ni a túmọ̀ láti èdè Gẹ̀ẹ́sì nípasẹ̀ ẹ̀rọ, kò sì tíì ṣàyẹ̀wò rẹ̀ láti ọwọ́ atúmọ̀-èdè kan.
Ibi tí èyí ti wá
Article on X Article by @atiku on X · https://x.com/atiku/status/2102445684846694501 2026-09-22 ›
He described the survey as particularly revealing because 32.4 per cent of rural respondents identified petrol as their primary concern, compared with 11.7 per cent in urban areas. Petrol also emerged as the leading concern in the Southwest, at 30.5 per cent, and the South-South, at 29.1 per cent—clear evidence that the suffering caused by Tinubu’s fuel policy cuts across geography, ethnicity and political affiliation. According to Atiku, “President Tinubu removed subsidy with a slogan, not a strategy. He had no credible plan for domestic refining, mass transportation, wage protection or the millions of small businesses that depend on affordable energy. “He was warned that this reckless approach would destroy purchasing power, increase transportation costs, worsen food inflation and push more Nigerians into poverty. He ignored those warnings.