Gịnị ka nnyocha ahụ na-egosi gbasara ka ọnụ ahịa mmanụ si na-emetụta ndị bi n'ebe dị iche iche nke mba a?
Nnyocha m kwuru banyere ya chọpụtara na petrol bụ isi nchegbu maka 32.4 pasent nke ndị bi na ime obodo, ebe ọ bụ 11.7 pasent n'ebe ndị bi n'obodo ukwu nọ. Ọ bụkwa isi nchegbu na Southwest, nke dị 30.5 pasent, na South-South, nke dị 29.1 pasent. Nke a na-egosi na ahụhụ ọnụ ahịa mmanụ dị elu na-ebute na-agabiga ókèala, agbụrụ na ndabere ndọrọ ndọrọ ọchịchị.
A sụgharịrị azịza ndị dị na peeji a site na Bekee site na igwe, ọ bụkwa na onye nsụgharị elelebeghị ha.
Ebe nke a si abịa
Article on X Article by @atiku on X · https://x.com/atiku/status/2102445684846694501 2026-09-22 ›
He described the survey as particularly revealing because 32.4 per cent of rural respondents identified petrol as their primary concern, compared with 11.7 per cent in urban areas. Petrol also emerged as the leading concern in the Southwest, at 30.5 per cent, and the South-South, at 29.1 per cent—clear evidence that the suffering caused by Tinubu’s fuel policy cuts across geography, ethnicity and political affiliation. According to Atiku, “President Tinubu removed subsidy with a slogan, not a strategy. He had no credible plan for domestic refining, mass transportation, wage protection or the millions of small businesses that depend on affordable energy. “He was warned that this reckless approach would destroy purchasing power, increase transportation costs, worsen food inflation and push more Nigerians into poverty. He ignored those warnings.